November’s chat paper, blog and moderation will be courtesy of University of Toronto MHScMRS program students Tasha McMaster, Winter Spence and Joanna Javor. The three students are doing this as part of their activities for one of their courses on education. They will, of course, be ably supported by the MRJC team!
So save the date and get ready to be schooled.
“Social media offers a new-age platform that influences the practice of (MRS professionals)”… you probably agree with this if you are a regular at MedRadJClub!
Bola,R and Liszewski, B. Knowledge Translation in 140 Characters or Less: #ProfessionalDevelopment #Collaboration #Patientengagement
This month we talked about the impact of social media on patient engagement, using Twitter to amplify your research message, virtual professional communities of practice and more. October’s chat was moderated by Kim Meeking. This month’s accompanying blog is by the article authors Ruby and Brian.
1. What are the perceived benefits of using social media for healthcare professionals?
2. How do you use social media? And how has using Twitter benefited you as a healthcare professional?
3. Do your professional responsibilities prevent you from engaging with social media? With other professionals? With patients?
4. Patients are increasingly turning to sites like Twitter to share their experiences and to seek support. How can we capitalize on the potential benefits of Twitter and bridge the gap between practitioner and patient?
How do patients that are lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) experience healthcare? What can we do as MRS professionals to improve our practice in this area? Come along in September and learn more!
September’s article is: Bolderston A, Ralph S. Improving the Health Care Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual or Transgendered patients. Radiography. 22(3), e207–e211
While you are here, pop over to this month’s blog by Ben Stuttard.
- What has been your training and experience around treating LGBTQ patients in the past?
- How does your organization approach this? Any examples of improvements in your workplace?
- After this chat, are there things you might do differently at work or at home?
Times: Vancouver 1pm (21st)/Toronto 4pm/UK 9pm/Sydney 6am (22nd)/Wellington 8am
Macmillan (UK) LGBTQ Experiences of Cancer Care Project
Fenway Institute (US) – free educational resources
Stonewall (UK) Advocacy and more
Cancer’s Margins (Canada) – LGBT2Q community-and-arts based approach to exploring sexual and gender diversity, and experiences of cancer health, support and care
Research alert! Some of the tweets in this month’s chat will be sampled/themed for a research poster. Contact Sophia for more details.
Missed the chat? The Storify is here!
This month’s paper is Ekpo E, Snaith B, Harris M, McEntee. Doctoral profile of the medical radiation sciences: a baseline for Australia and New Zealand. JMRS (early access).
This month’s blog is written by one of the authors Mark McEntee.
Developing a profession’s research base requires research “users, participants and leaders”. Attaining a doctorate strongly correlates with published papers and research grants. The UK’s Society of Radiographers research strategy includes a goal of 1% of radiographers (about 300) holding, or working towards, a Doctoral level award by 2021. International numbers of MRS professionals with a doctorate are low, however. Is this important? Are you thinking about or already have a doctorate? Come and talk doctorates with us on August 15th.
Times: Vancouver 1pm (15th)/Toronto 4pm/UK 9pm/Sydney 6am (16th)/Wellington 8am
- Is there a link between being an evidence based profession and doctoral practitioners?
- Is there a distinction between types of doctorates (e.g. DProf, PhD, by publication) that is important for MRS researchers?
- In the Ekpo et al study the majority of respondents (63%) worked in an academic institution – let’s talk about the role of clinical academic medical radiation practitioners!
- Does goal setting help? (e.g. the UK’s SOR wants 1% of the MRS workforce (about 300) to hold, or be working towards, a Doctoral level award by 2021)
Further reading: Snaith B, Harris M, Harris R. Radiographers as doctors: A profile of UK doctoral achievement. Radiography (2016). 22; 282-286
Metcalf KL, Adams RD, Qaqish B, Church JA. Survey of R.T.s with doctorates:
barriers to conducting research. Radiol Technol 2010;81:417e27.
Janice St John Matthews: The Impact of My Doctorate (Part One and two): WordPress blog
No MRS article this month! Instead we had a general chat about getting into research, how to find support, what mentorship can do for you, the pros, perils and pitfalls….!
To find out if you too are an early career researcher pop over to this month’s blog by Kim Meeking.
The Thesis Whisperer: Useful doctoral (and general) research resources
Academic Primer Series: Five Key Papers Fostering Educational Scholarship in Junior Academic Faculty
JMIRS free collection of articles about research (lots of “how tos”!)
For UK people: Radiographers in research: how to get involved (Sept 5th evening event in London)
Society of Radiographers research page (includes information on the Council for Allied Health Professions Research)
The Researcher – NHS online magazine for health researchers
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins & Ovid: Demystifying Research – Simplifying Critical Appraisal
T1: We are all required to be research aware/informed practitioners, but should we all be researchers?
T2: “Early career researcher” is often associated with attaining a doctorate (see chart by Geoff Currie) – is this a good description for MRS researchers?
T3: Do you need an affiliation with a university to be an ECR or primarily a clinical role?
T4: For those more established in research – what would be your one piece of advice to aspirational researchers?
Couldn’t make it? July’s transcript is here.
What role should we play in public health promotion? One area where MRS professionals are often involved is smoking cessation, especially for radiation therapists. Our paper this month looks at this topic, but our chat will open up a wider discussion about the other areas of public health where all of us can make a difference.
Ganesh V, Zaki P, Chan S, Turner A, Bristow B, Di Prospero L, Gibson L, DeAngelis C, Chow E. Adverse Health Outcomes Associated with Postdiagnosis Smoking in Prostate Cancer Patients: A Literature Review. JMIRS. 48 (1) p 103–110
Check out this month’s blog by Linda Hindle, Lead Allied Health Professional, Public Health England.
- Are radiographers reluctant to engage with health prevention/public health issues? If so, why?
- Do you feel comfortable addressing health prevention/promotion (e.g. smoking, alcohol use, exercise) in your role?
- For smoking cessation- what is your experience? Are patients open to hearing about quitting options etc?
- Do radiographers have a role in preventative/public health/prevention?
UK Public Health and Radiography special interest group
Make Every Contact Count (UK initiative)
The delivery of health improvement information during radiotherapy treatment: A survey of UK therapy radiographers
Healthy Conversations and the Allied Health Professionals
A strategy to develop the capacity, impact and profie of allied health professionals in public health 2015-2018 (Public Health England)
Times: Vancouver 1pm (20th)/Toronto 4pm/UK 9pm/Sydney 6am (21st)/Wellington 8am
May 24th was a 12 hour chat on the perception of medical radiation dose by the public (and non-medical radiation professionals). Our May paper is Singh et al. A snapshot of patients’ awareness of radiation dose and risks associated with medical imaging examinations at an Australian radiology clinic. Radiography, 2017. 23(2) 94-102
Ukkola et al. Patient information regarding medical radiation exposure is inadequate: Patients’ experience in a university hospital. Radiography in press.
Coppolino et al. Quantifying Worry in the Face of Uncertainty: Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. JMIRS in press.
Start time: 3am Vancouver, 6am Toronto, 10am GMT, 8pm Sydney, 10pm Wellington
Last hour (moderated chat): 2pm Vancouver, 5pm Toronto, 9pm GMT, 7am Sydney, 9am Wellington
- This study concluded that most patients wanted to be informed about the risks from radiation exposure, under the guidance of the referring doctor, in a shared decision making environment. Do referrers, specifically GPs, have the (a) time or (b) the knowledge to provided this?
- What role should Medical Radiation Professionals have in providing information about the risk from radiation exposure for these procedures?
- Are Medical Radiation Professionals equipped with the information / tools necessary to provide this information?
Extended discussion points:
- Is the theory (LNT) behind the risk from radiation exposure contemporary? Are low radiation dose examinations safer than we have traditionally thought?
- Are some of the gaps in knowledge of patients in this area partially attributed to our profession’s poor visibility in the healthcare landscape?
Missed the chat? Never fear, the Storify is here.